From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
Date: | 2006-08-11 14:31:23 |
Message-ID: | 44DC94BB.6090300@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway napsal(a):
> However, is there a reason to use Trac beyond the fact that it is
> already setup? ISTM we only need a wiki, and don't need the other
> features of Trac, such as the bug tracker.
I do not agree. How you determine what release fixes the bug now? We
have web page and mailing list for bug reporting but there is not any
relation between bug, patch and release(s). I think bug tracking is
necessary if we want move forward.
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-11 14:55:55 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-11 13:14:47 | Re: Bison Version |