From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib |
Date: | 2006-08-09 21:04:42 |
Message-ID: | 44DA4DEA.6040200@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:17:44PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>
>>> Platypus just started failing...
>>> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2010:05:01
>>>
>>> Rest of the farm is looking pretty green, though, so I'm not sure what
>>> to make of it... but
>>> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2009:05:01
>>> is the first run it failed on, and several files changed in ecpg/test:
>>>
>>> Files changed this run
>>>
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/ChangeLog 1.320
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/include/pgtypes_numeric.h 1.16
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-num_test2.c 1.2
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/pgtypeslib-num_test2.stdout 1.2
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/pgtypeslib/num_test2.pgc 1.2
>>> pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/numeric.c 1.29
>>>
>>> Also, it looks like "Files changed since last sucess" maybe isn't
>>> working right? Or does it intentionally exclude files already listed in
>>> "changed since last run"?
>>>
>>>
>> Jim, can you upgrade your version of the script to the latest in CVS?
>>
>> http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pgbuildfarm/client-code/run_build.pl?rev=1.64&content-type=text/plain
>>
>> It has a feature that blows away the ccache directory on failure, so
>> that we don't have a failure that might be caused by ccache persisting.
>>
>
> Doesn't seem to be working; the cache still had data after
> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=platypus&dt=2006-08-09%2019:59:17.
>
*ahem* you loaded 1.62 (the latest release), not 1.64 (cvs tip) like I
asked.
>
>> After that, remove the actual cache.( I notice that you are using ccache
>> but don't seem to have a cache directory set - that can be a problem,
>> too. It's best to have a cache per branch)
>>
>
> That seems kinda bunk, since ccache is normally used in a system-wide
> setting.
>
Not on my boxes! ;-) ccache is only used if explicitly invoked in my world.
>> Alternatively, just turn off use of ccache in your config file -
>> probably commenting out this line would suffice:
>>
>> 'CC' => 'ccache gcc -O3 -pipe'
>>
>>
>> And see if that fixes the problem.
>>
>
> Nope, no dice...
>
At any rate, do please try to blow the cache away manually and rerun.
btw, your config file also looks slightly out of date - a modern one
will set up a per branch cache, which is both safer and more effective.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-09 21:11:37 | Re: Buildfarm failure on ecpg/test/pgtypeslib |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-08-09 20:56:42 | Re: 8.2 features status |