From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Lang <david(at)lang(dot)hm> |
Cc: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes(at)atua(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good |
Date: | 2006-08-09 16:27:41 |
Message-ID: | 44DA0CFD.6080308@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>> Ahh and which companies would these be? As a representative of the
>> most prominent one in the US I can tell you that you are not speaking
>> from a knowledgeable position.
>
> note I said many, not all. I am aware that your company does not fall
> into this catagory.
I know, but I am curious as to *what* companies. Any reputable
PostgreSQL company is going to support Linux as a whole except maybe
some fringe distros like Gentoo or RedFlag. Not to mention FreeBSD and
Solaris.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> David Lang
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Lang | 2006-08-09 16:37:37 | Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-08-09 16:26:21 | Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 |