Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-09 15:12:39
Message-ID: 44D9FB67.4060908@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> What this story does do for me is reinforce the notion that it's
> critical for newbie developers to work "in the open", getting feedback
> from the lists at an early stage about what they are doing. If you go
> off in a corner and develop a patch for a TODO item, you risk having it
> rejected because you misunderstood what the TODO item was about.

I 100% agree with this. Newbie developers should be in the open and it
kind of lends itself to my Mentors idea that I mentioned previously.

The problem I see is that even if they are in the open we make it fairly
difficult to get the information they need to get started.

>
> Maybe the connection is that while thinking about processes, we need
> to take into account the need to encourage people to get early
> feedback about what they are considering doing.

Agreed.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message korryd@enterprisedb.com 2006-08-09 15:18:56 Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-09 15:05:48 Re: 8.2 features status