Re: pgsql: Add detail on packages: > > A package would be a

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add detail on packages: > > A package would be a
Date: 2006-08-08 19:15:45
Message-ID: 44D8E2E1.1020205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> A package would be a schema with its own variables,
>> private functions, and initialization functions
>>
>>

What are the intended scope and lifetime of package private variables?
This could be very cool and useful, but it could also be a major can of
worms.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 19:43:11 pgsql: Fix 'make clean' for change of regression.diffs file name.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 19:15:09 pgsql: Add a feature for automatic initialization and finalization of

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 19:18:18 Re: [BUGS] Patch to allow C extension modules to initialize/finish
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-08-08 19:10:13 Re: buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0