| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Intermittent "make check" failures on hyena |
| Date: | 2006-08-06 21:29:12 |
| Message-ID: | 44D65F28.8070004@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>I see one occurrence in the 8.1 branch on hyena, but the failure
>probability seems to have jumped way up in HEAD since we put in the
>C-coded pg_regress. This lends weight to the idea that it's a
>timing-related issue, because pg_regress.c is presumably much faster
>at forking off a parallel gang of psqls than the shell script was;
>and it's hard to see what else about the pg_regress change could be
>affecting the psqls' ability to connect once forked.
>
>We probably need to get some Solaris experts involved in diagnosing
>what's happening. Judging by the buildfarm results you should be able
>to replicate it fairly easily by doing "make installcheck-parallel"
>repeatedly.
>
>
>
>
I will refer this to those experts - my Solaris-fu is a tad rusty these
days.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Agent M | 2006-08-06 21:49:45 | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-08-06 19:50:21 | Re: problem with volatile functions in subselects ? |