Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-05 15:32:20
Message-ID: 44D4BA04.1050509@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> The fact is, the existing system worked as it should, though it is often
> invisible. We didn't get all the features we wanted, but that isn't
> because the system isn't working.

Well that kind of comes back to my point of better communication.
Perhaps a lot of this discussion could have been avoided if the TODO had
been more... proactive?

For example:

Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06

I *think* it was peter that did that one, but you see my point.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-08-05 15:59:10 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-05 15:31:24 Re: 8.2 features status