| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-05 04:19:54 |
| Message-ID: | 44D41C6A.5000009@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote:
> So, the things I hear most non-postgresql people complain about wrt postgresql
> are:
>
> no full text indexing built in
> no replication built in
> no stored procedures (with a mix of wanting in db cron facility)
> the planner is not smart enough (with a mix of wanting hints)
> vacuum leads to unpredictable performance
FTI is a biggie in my mind. I know it ain't happening for 8.2, but is
the general plan to integrate TSearch2 directly into the backend?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-05 05:23:55 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-05 04:04:43 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |