Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 14:42:58
Message-ID: 44D35CF2.7000909@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> +1
>
> UPDATE/DELETE for CE are a big deal - I really wish we had INSERT too, then
> we'd be able to claim "complete" support for partitioning, but this is a big
> deal improvement.

I haven't be following this but.. does the above mean that if CE is
turned on and they are partitioned tables, I don't have to use a trigger
for update/delete operations?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> - Luke
>
>
> On 8/3/06 9:30 PM, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
>> A lot of the things on Tom's list are new bits of functionality to things
>> added around 8.0 and 8.1 (major enhancements to the usability of
>> constraint exclusion, for example).
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-04 14:45:56 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Jan de Visser 2006-08-04 14:40:10 Re: 8.2 features status