From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Date: | 2006-08-03 17:48:36 |
Message-ID: | 44D236F4.2010001@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Should we give VALUES its own reference page? That doesn't quite
>>seem helpful either. cc'ing to pgsql-docs for ideas.
>
> This is probably the sort of thing that should be explained part II "The
> SQL Language". In particular, section 7.2 is about table expressions,
> which this is either a case of or related to.
>
> A few examples on the command references pages to show how it can be
> useful are probably OK, but the big picture shoulbd be developed in
> chapter 7 or so.
>
I'll need some time (perhaps a few weeks because I'm just starting to do
business travel again), but I'll take responsibility to write something
up if you'd like.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 00:36:45 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-03 17:11:47 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-03 18:03:42 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-03 17:38:16 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-03 18:03:42 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-03 17:38:16 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |