From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Replication Documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-02 16:42:40 |
Message-ID: | 44D0D600.30201@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi,
Andrew Hammond wrote:
> I can see value in documenting what replication systems are known to
> work (for some definition of work) with a given release in the
> documentation for that release. Five years down the road when I'm
> trying to implement replication for a client who's somehow locked into
> postgres 8.2 (for whatever reason), it would be very helpful to know
> that slony1.2 is an option. I don't know if this is sufficient
> justification.
Please keep in mind, that most replication solutions (that I know of)
are quite independent from the PostgreSQL version used. Thus,
documenting which version of PostgreSQL can be used with which version
of a replication system should better be covered in the documentation of
the replication system. Otherwise you would have to update the
PostgreSQL documentation for new releases of your favorite replication
system - which seems to lead to confusion.
> Including a separate page on the history of postgres replication to
> date also makes some sense, at least to me. It should be relatively
> easy to maintain.
I agree that having such a 'replication guide for users of PostgreSQL'
is a good thing to have. But I think not much of that should be part of
the official PostgreSQL documentation - mainly because the replication
solutions are not part of PostgreSQL.
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 18:10:11 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-02 15:56:23 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 18:10:11 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-02 15:56:23 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |