Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Date: 2006-08-02 05:50:06
Message-ID: 44D03D0E.1070901@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>
> Anyway, with the attached diff, the 2 million inserts case is back to
> about 730 MB memory use, and speed is pretty much the same as reported
> yesterday (i.e both memory use and performance better than mysql with
> innodb tables).

That's all that matters ;)

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:52:31 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:26:53 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:52:31 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:26:53 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:52:31 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-08-02 05:26:53 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: