From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Date: | 2006-08-02 05:50:06 |
Message-ID: | 44D03D0E.1070901@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>
> Anyway, with the attached diff, the 2 million inserts case is back to
> about 730 MB memory use, and speed is pretty much the same as reported
> yesterday (i.e both memory use and performance better than mysql with
> innodb tables).
That's all that matters ;)
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:52:31 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:26:53 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:52:31 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:26:53 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:52:31 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-02 05:26:53 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |