| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Best Procedural Language? |
| Date: | 2006-08-02 05:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | 44D03287.5030404@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Well, the surprise for me is: this is exactly what I thought! I actually do
> have a lot of string manipulation to do, but I am the only one on the team
> with Tcl experience. For the sake of other developers I thought that the
> plPHP project would be interesting, but I don't get the impression that it
> is as well-developed as plTcl. Does anyone know anything about it?
plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very
well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks
and training classes on it now.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-02 05:45:28 | Re: LISTEN considered dangerous |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-02 04:45:12 | Re: Best Procedural Language? |