From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Date: | 2006-08-01 20:41:28 |
Message-ID: | 44CFBC78.2020508@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> What I'm inclined to do for 8.2 is to disallow OLD/NEW references in
> multi-element VALUES clauses; the feature is still tremendously useful
> without that.
Given the timing, this sounds like a reasonable approach. I agree that
the feature has lots of interesting uses -- I'd hate to see us lose
that. Disallowing OLD/NEW references doesn't contradict the spec in any
way AFAIK either.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-01 20:47:34 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 20:26:44 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-01 20:47:34 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 20:40:28 | Re: Replication Documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-01 20:47:34 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 20:40:28 | Re: Replication Documentation |