From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connection limit and Superuser |
Date: | 2006-07-31 15:28:50 |
Message-ID: | 44CE21B2.4020904@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> As a protection against malice, yes. I think Rod was more interested in
> some protection against stupidity.
>
> Maybe the real answer is that Slony should connect as a non-superuser
> and call security definer functions for the privileged things it needs
> to do.
Wouldn't that break Slony's ability to connect to older postgresql
versions and replicate?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-31 15:58:30 | Re: Connection limit and Superuser |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-31 15:26:10 | Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update |