Re: Connection limit and Superuser

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connection limit and Superuser
Date: 2006-07-31 15:28:50
Message-ID: 44CE21B2.4020904@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>
> As a protection against malice, yes. I think Rod was more interested in
> some protection against stupidity.
>
> Maybe the real answer is that Slony should connect as a non-superuser
> and call security definer functions for the privileged things it needs
> to do.

Wouldn't that break Slony's ability to connect to older postgresql
versions and replicate?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-31 15:58:30 Re: Connection limit and Superuser
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-31 15:26:10 Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update