| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Pgsql-Advocacy(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time to scale up? |
| Date: | 2006-07-26 07:06:09 |
| Message-ID: | 44C71461.5040604@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Which version of Replication do we throw in here?
>
IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio
that makes sense. This goes for other projects as well. A qualified
community jury would have the final vote. Today there is very little
incentive to join forces and in many cases that's bad both for the
add-ons and for the PostgreSQL image as a whole.
We should strive to establish a distribution containing no ambiguities
and the process that we put in place should establish incentives to make
that happen. The 'specialized teams' that I mentioned in my original
suggestion are intended to do this.
I also think that we need more conferences to break the ice and make
such merges happen.
Kind Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | robert.bernier5 | 2006-07-26 12:26:45 | Re: Time to scale up? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-26 06:43:53 | Re: Time to scale up? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-26 14:05:46 | Re: Time to scale up? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-26 06:43:53 | Re: Time to scale up? |