| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: root/administartor user check option. |
| Date: | 2006-07-25 16:21:07 |
| Message-ID: | 44C644F3.9040704@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
> To: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 25/07/06 11:27
> Subject: [HACKERS] root/administartor user check option.
>
>
>> I would like to start a discussion about having an extra option in PG
>> which makes possible to bypass (or not check) whether the current user
>> has root/administrative privileges domains.
>>
>
> 8.2 will run under an admin account. It sheds unwanted privileges at startup.
>
>
Which user does it switch to? I was under the impression that Gevik
wanted not to have to create any extra users.Or does it abandon
privileges without switching personality (if that's possible)?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcin Mank | 2006-07-25 16:23:04 | Re: plPHP and plRuby |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-25 16:18:38 | Re: Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug |