From: | Eric E <whalesuit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL General (EN)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem getting postmaster PID in pg_regress |
Date: | 2006-07-21 18:45:15 |
Message-ID: | 44C120BB.8090808@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sorry - that semicolon is an artifact of a change I made - I attempted
to put
postmaster_pid=$! inside the executing statement, but as I discovered,
if you put it before last &, you
get the backgrounded process before postmaster.
I'm presently checking out how the SLES init scripts work, but any
thoughts would be very welcome.
Thanks,
EE
Tom Lane wrote:
> Eric E <whalesuit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I chased the problem down to the following lines in pg_regress:
>>
>
>
>> "$bindir/postmaster" -D "$PGDATA" -F $postmaster_options
>> > "$LOGDIR/postmaster.log"; 2>&1 &
>>
> ^
>
> Is there really a semicolon there? There should not be (and isn't in
> my copy of 8.1)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Jones | 2006-07-21 20:49:02 | Re: Impact of vacuum full... |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-07-21 17:58:38 | Re: Impact of vacuum full... |