Re: plPHP and plRuby

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plPHP and plRuby
Date: 2006-07-21 00:45:03
Message-ID: 44C0238F.2050705@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> And if that didn't convince you, I still got PL/sh in the wait ...
>
> It seems like there may be enough interest in PL/Ruby to justify
> including it in our distro, but after taking a look at the package
> I can see a couple of pretty serious objections:
>
> 1. Wrong license. Unless the author can be persuaded to relicense as
> straight BSD, this discussion is a waste of time.

As I mentioned previously, I have already negotiated for a relicense.

>
> 2. Coding style. The man does not believe in comments; do we really
> think anyone else is going to be able to maintain his work?

Yes, this was one of my concerns.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-21 00:46:13 Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-07-21 00:43:01 Re: pgsql: As a stopgap to get the Windows buildfarm members running again,