From: | Joshua Reich <josh(at)root(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for contrib/cube |
Date: | 2006-07-18 13:45:39 |
Message-ID: | 44BCE603.1080202@root.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I have completed upgrading the cube codebase to use the V1 call
protocol. However, before I submit a patch I would really like to work
out why I have never been able to get cube to pass installcheck.
This is what I get when I run installcheck on a clean version of 8.1.4
(I get similar results on CVS HEAD). The regression.diff is attached.
josh:~/installs/postgresql-8.1.4/contrib/cube josh$ make installcheck
make -C ../../src/test/regress pg_regress
make[1]: `pg_regress' is up to date.
/bin/sh ../../src/test/regress/pg_regress --dbname=contrib_regression cube
(using postmaster on Unix socket, default port)
============== dropping database "contrib_regression" ==============
DROP DATABASE
============== creating database "contrib_regression" ==============
CREATE DATABASE
============== dropping regression test user accounts ==============
============== running regression test queries ==============
test cube ... FAILED
======================
1 of 1 tests failed.
======================
I have tried this both on OS X and Linux and get similar results.
Josh Reich
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 17:55 -0400, Joshua Reich wrote:
>> Ok. So, the cube code looks very unmaintained (not to offend anyone),
>> but it is all in V0 and I believe make installcheck fails out of the box
>> due to new error message formats.
>
> It passes for me with CVS HEAD. The cube regression test is also run as
> part of the buildfarm process, so it sounds like an error on your end.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
regression.diffs | text/plain | 6.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-07-18 13:46:39 | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-07-18 12:56:05 | Re: set search_path in dump output considered harmful |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-18 14:36:04 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-07-18 13:06:22 | pgcrypto merge cleanup |