Re: Fwd: Long term database archival

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Long term database archival
Date: 2006-07-12 21:58:11
Message-ID: 44B57073.8000004@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12. July 2006 21:03, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
>> Long term archival of electronic data is a BIG problem in the
>> archivist community. I remember, a few years ago, a paper
>> describing the problem of historical (20+ years old) data which
>> were running the risk of being lost simply because of lacking
>> of proper hardware.
>
> I've been reading probate protocols from the 17th century in
> original, which are still in perfect condition. It's quite a
> contrast to the present discussion, talking about a few decades.
> It's very serious, really. A few centuries from now, our age may
> appear as a black hole in history, because of our monumental lack
> of care in the preservation of contemporary data.

I wonder if the 9/11 Commission Report was printed on acid-free paper.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEtXBzS9HxQb37XmcRAupGAJ9fR8y85KCRfg6tXkijIn2VA2viNQCgv6Jt
tJWmGlEgH46ctno1Ghoj/Ow=
=OK8Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2006-07-13 00:33:20 SQL Standards Compliance With Case
Previous Message nkunkov 2006-07-12 20:38:34 Re: Dynamic table with variable number of columns