| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Date: | 2006-07-10 12:20:20 |
| Message-ID: | 44B24604.1070607@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martjin, Greg, Marc, etc.:
> However, I think the other suggestions of having the listbot mangle the
> reply-tos of -patches and -committers to be -hackers would probably be
> good too. I myself subscribe to -committers in digest form (where I
> look at the summary to see if it's interesting) and read -patches
> occasionally via the archives to see if anything is there...
I agree that mangling the reply-tos would be the least complex (and thus
probably best) solution. Unlike attachment stripping, this is supported
by majordomo.
However, to save on spam filtering, the reply-to should add -hackers
*also*, not instead.
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-07-10 15:22:49 | Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-07-10 10:41:33 | comparing record and record problem if first rec is from function |