From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: need vacuum after insert/truncate/insert? |
Date: | 2006-07-07 08:32:07 |
Message-ID: | 44AE1C07.60009@logix-tt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Craig,
Craig A. James wrote:
> If I insert a bunch of rows, then truncate, then insert a bunch more
> rows, do I need to vacuum? I've been assuming that TRUNCATE TABLE is a
> brute-force technique that more-or-less tosses the old table and starts
> fresh so that no vacuum is necessary.
>
> Second question: Same scenario as above, but now the table has indexes.
> Is a reindex needed, or are the indexes they "truncated" too?
AFAIK, both table and indices are "cut down" nicely.
But you will need an ANALYZE after refilling of the table, to have
current statistics.
HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-07-07 08:33:31 | Re: Update INSERT RULE while running for Partitioning |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-07-07 08:28:54 | Re: getting better performance |