From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: buildfarm stats |
Date: | 2006-07-05 19:40:41 |
Message-ID: | 44AC15B9.5030204@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Mair wrote:
>>but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal
>>data somewhere isn't really an option.
>>
>>I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in these 2 tables:
>>
>>system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler |
>>compiler_version | architecture >
>>build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >
>>
>>(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage
>>that failed otherwise).
>>
>>
>>But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?
>>
>>
>
>Nothing important at all.
>I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
>(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
>arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
>some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...
>
>But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
>mailing list syndrome ;)
>
>
>
>
We don't have any timing info.
For now this goes on the wishlist.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-05 20:02:30 | Re: Scan Keys |
Previous Message | Chris Mair | 2006-07-05 19:34:43 | Re: buildfarm stats |