Re: buildfarm stats

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: buildfarm stats
Date: 2006-07-05 19:40:41
Message-ID: 44AC15B9.5030204@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Mair wrote:

>>but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal
>>data somewhere isn't really an option.
>>
>>I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in these 2 tables:
>>
>>system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler |
>>compiler_version | architecture >
>>build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >
>>
>>(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage
>>that failed otherwise).
>>
>>
>>But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?
>>
>>
>
>Nothing important at all.
>I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
>(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
>arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
>some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...
>
>But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
>mailing list syndrome ;)
>
>
>
>

We don't have any timing info.

For now this goes on the wishlist.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-07-05 20:02:30 Re: Scan Keys
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-07-05 19:34:43 Re: buildfarm stats