From: | Fabrice Franquenk <Fabrice(dot)Franquenk(at)bull(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL Internals question |
Date: | 2006-07-05 09:29:55 |
Message-ID: | 44AB8693.10700@bull.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane a écrit :
> Fabrice Franquenk <Fabrice(dot)Franquenk(at)bull(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Now i tried to set the bgwriter_lru_percent to 100% and
>> bgwriter_lru_maxpages to 1000 and
>> i did not spot any difference with the disk activities, cpu occupation
>> or anything else from
>>
>
> Hmm, are you sure your changes took effect? To get the bgwriter's
> attention you need to make the change in postgresql.conf and then
> SIGHUP or restart the postmaster. I'd have thought you could easily
> measure a difference given that much change ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
I made sure that all changes in postgresql.conf took effect. I restarted
the postmaster and i could not spot
any difference.
The values of bgwriter_all_percent and bgwriter_all_maxpages are all
default (and i set checkpoints segments value to 250). Could there be
some kind of connection between these parameters and the bgwriter_lru_*
parameters?
by the way, was i correct describing the transaction handling mechanism ?
thanks for your help
regards,
Fabrice Franquenk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabrice Franquenk | 2006-07-05 09:38:28 | Do checkpoints flush all data from shared buffers ? |
Previous Message | Christoph Della Valle | 2006-07-05 06:30:20 | Re: copy recursive data |