From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)jdrake(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | CVS mirror, was Re: [PATCHES] ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT) |
Date: | 2006-07-03 15:08:18 |
Message-ID: | 44A932E2.60504@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
[redirecting to -hackers]
context: a buildfarm member apparently failed through getting a partial
update from CVS, possibly because the anonymous mirror was also
partially updated.
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Since CVS updates are not atomic, it's hard to see how mirroring could be,
>>unless you did something like disallow updates, mirror, allow updates. I
>>suspect such a cure would be worse than the disease. This is such a rare
>>event that I don't think it's worth the trouble. Buildfarm members are doing
>>200 builds a day or more, and I can't recall having seen this before.
>>
>>
>
>Yeah, I don't remember having seen it before either, but on the other
>hand I haven't been paying super close attention.
>
>One easy low-tech fix would be for Marc to publish the exact times at
>which the mirror syncs run (I think it might be something like 20 past
>the hour but I'm not sure), and then we could tell buildfarm owners not
>to schedule their CVS pulls to start in that particular five-minute
>window, and committers could try to avoid committing many-file patches
>right then either.
>
>
>
>
Yuck. I think if it gets that far we would have discovered a compelling
reason to abandon CVS, as many bystanders have urged us to do. But I
think we can live with an occasional hiccup.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-03 15:21:56 | Re: MultiXactID Wrap-Around |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-03 14:48:04 | Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-03 15:24:49 | Re: CVS mirror, was Re: [PATCHES] ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-03 14:48:04 | Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT) |