Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: 2006-06-27 15:45:53
Message-ID: 44A152B1.1020302@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:23:13AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I see a performance issue on win32. This problem is causes by the
>>following URL.
>>
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823764/EN-US/
>>
>>On win32, default SO_SNDBUF value is 8192 bytes. And libpq's buffer is
>>8192 too.
>>
>>
>
>Ok, so there's a difficiency in Windows TCP code. Do you have any
>benchmarks to show this actually makes a difference. According to the
>URL you give, the problem occurs if the libpq buffer is *bigger* than
>the socket buffer, which it isn't...
>
>

No, it says it occurs if this condition is met: "A single *send* call or
*WSASend* call fills the whole underlying socket send buffer."

This will surely be true if the buffer sizes are the same. They
recommend making the socket buffer at least 1 byte bigger.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rocco Altier 2006-06-27 15:50:59 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-06-27 15:44:30 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-27 16:13:18 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-06-27 15:44:30 Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?