Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted
Date: 2006-06-22 13:58:32
Message-ID: 449AA208.3060607@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>>>Won't we still need to know if we are called as postmaster or
>>>postgres?
>>>
>>>
>
>No. The entire point of the recent changes is that the behavior no
>longer depends on the name of the executable, only on the switches.
>
>
>
>

Oh. My mistake. That sounds good.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-22 13:59:06 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-22 13:52:24 Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)