Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

From: David Roussel <pgsql-performance(at)diroussel(dot)xsmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-06-22 13:03:47
Message-ID: 449A9533.1030103@diroussel.xsmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
>
> Here is a graph of our performance measured on PostgreSQL:
> http://achelois.tweakers.net/~acm/pgsql-t2000/T2000-schaling-postgresql.png
>
>
...
>
> The "perfect" line is based on the "Max" value for 1 core and then
> just multiplied by the amount of cores to have a linear reference. The
> "Bij 50" and the "perfect" line don't differ too much in color, but
> the top-one is the "perfect" line.

Sureky the 'perfect' line ought to be linear? If the performance was
perfectly linear, then the 'pages generated' ought to be G times the
number (virtual) processors, where G is the gradient of the graph. In
such a case the graph will go through the origin (o,o), but you graph
does not show this.

I'm a bit confused, what is the 'perfect' supposed to be?

Thanks

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-22 13:05:41 Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-06-22 12:23:48 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig A. James 2006-06-22 14:03:25 Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Previous Message Sven Geisler 2006-06-22 12:19:58 Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.