"Glen W. Mabey" <Glen(dot)Mabey(at)swri(dot)org> writes:
> What I see is a bunch of stuff related to the Acquisitions table,
> including a relation for the primary key, which was created back when
> the table was named "Acquisition" (not plural), and two different views
> which draw on Acquisitions, both of which appear to be fully
> functional.
I wonder whether "reindex index pg_class_relname_nsp_index" would make
this go away.
regards, tom lane