From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: UPDATE crash in HEAD and 8.1 |
Date: | 2006-06-20 17:48:59 |
Message-ID: | 4498350B.1030204@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> update pk set id = max(id) + 2;
>>
>
> I'm fairly sure this query is illegal per spec. There are ancient
> discussions in the archives about whether aggregates in an UPDATE target
> list can have a consistent interpretation or not. We never found one,
> but never got around to disallowing it either. Maybe it's time. If you
> try it with something like sum() you don't get a crash, but you do get
> rather bizarre behavior.
>
> Having said that, this may well expose a bug in the MAX-optimization
> code that has consequences for more useful queries. I'll take a look
> later today if no one beats me to it.
>
>
If you try the query on 8.0 and before you don't get a crash either, but
the result is unexpected. Try this version:
create table pk (id bigserial primary key, orig bigint);
insert into pk (id) values (DEFAULT);
insert into pk (id) values (DEFAULT);
insert into pk (id) values (DEFAULT);
update pk set orig = id;
select * from pk;
update pk set id = max(id) + 2;
select * from pk;
One could almost argue that crashing would be better ;-)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-06-20 18:03:13 | Re: UPDATE crash in HEAD and 8.1 |
Previous Message | Robert Lor | 2006-06-20 17:44:43 | Re: Generic Monitoring Framework Proposal |