| From: | Nis Jorgensen <nis(at)superlativ(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | kah_hang_ang(at)toray(dot)com(dot)my |
| Cc: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql? |
| Date: | 2006-06-15 08:15:02 |
| Message-ID: | 44911706.60204@superlativ.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
kah_hang_ang(at)toray(dot)com(dot)my wrote:
> both of the two database are live but use for two different web app.
> my company don't want to spend more to buy a new server, so then I think of
> to implement both under the same server and one instance..
> but then my superior don't want to do that way.
> they want to implement two databases in one server but if one of the
> database down it will not affect the other, so that's why I need to have
> two instances.
We are currently running your suggestion (two instances of PG) in a
production server, with no obvious problems attributable to the setup
(we have seen some performance problems with one system, but those are
likely caused by bad db/application design).
In our case the two systems are running different minor versions
(although we are planning to migrate them both to the latest 7.4.x).
/Nis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jody brownell | 2006-06-15 12:01:18 | Re: Postgres consuming way too much memory??? |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-06-15 08:00:27 | Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement |