From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Best <nbest(at)ci(dot)uchicago(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4) |
Date: | 2009-08-07 21:45:00 |
Message-ID: | 449.1249681500@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Neil Best <nbest(at)ci(dot)uchicago(dot)edu> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit
>> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network
>> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries
>> are.
> Thanks for your comments, Tom. The operation seems more reliable if I
> move the data to the server and do it across a local connection, which
> I presume does not involve SSL, so that may be the weak link as you
> surmise. Would you expect the SSL library problem more likely to be
> on the server or the client, or is it just hard to say?
You're talking like you've found this to be repeatable. Is it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christine Desmuke | 2009-08-07 22:29:23 | Re: Make check fails on 8.3.7 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-07 21:42:10 | Re: Changing referenced primary key column type |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-07 22:02:32 | Re: Alpha releases: How to tag |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-07 21:43:18 | Re: Durability? |