Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?

From: Sven Geisler <sgeisler(at)aeccom(dot)com>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: 2006-06-13 12:52:02
Message-ID: 448EB4F2.2010105@aeccom.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Luke,

Luke Lonergan schrieb:
> On 6/13/06 5:46 AM, "Sven Geisler" <sgeisler(at)aeccom(dot)com> wrote:
>> You already get this change if you compile PostgreSQL 8.1.x in x86_64
>> (64-bit mode).
>
> I see, so I think your point with the patch is to make the 32-bit compiled
> version benefit as well.
>

Yup. I think you have to change this in the 32-bit compiled version too
if you want to compare 32-bit and 64-bit on a Opteron.

Sven.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2006-06-13 13:15:06 Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-06-13 12:49:44 Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?