| From: | Nis Jorgensen <nis(at)superlativ(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 08:40:20 |
| Message-ID: | 448E79F4.1060303@superlativ.dk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
> We have been using PostgreSQL on Opteron servers almost since the
> Opteron was first released, running both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of
> Linux. Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions have been bulletproof for us,
> with the usual stability I've become accustomed to with both PostgreSQL
> and Linux. We have been running nothing but 64-bit versions on
> mission-critical systems for the last year with zero problems.
>
> The short story is that for us 64-bit PostgreSQL on Opterons is
> typically something like 20% faster than 32-bit on the same, and *much*
> faster than P4 Xeon systems they nominally compete with.
Since you sound like you have done extensive testing:
Do you have any data regarding whether to enable hyperthreading or not?
I realize that this may be highly dependant on the OS, application and
number of CPUs, but I would be interested in hearing your
recommendations (or others').
/Nis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sven Geisler | 2006-06-13 09:04:32 | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
| Previous Message | Ruben Rubio Rey | 2006-06-13 08:17:08 | Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? |