From: | John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Slony-I Mailing List <slony1-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Ever increasing OIDs - gonna run out soon? |
Date: | 2006-06-11 17:40:14 |
Message-ID: | 448C557E.6050706@wardbrook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Back in April 2006 I emailed about high OIDs in a 7.4.6 database.
I've just added new tables to the database (and the slony-relication
set) and I'm seeing much higher OID values for the new tables.
In April I added a table, it was assigned an OID value of 94198669 (94
million). I've just added three new tables (using an interactive psql
session), and the OIDs assigned are (now in the 182 million range):
wcpartner 182027615
wccustomdata 182027995
wccustpartnerdata 182028076
All the tables are created without OIDs, eg
create table customer.wcpartner (
wcpartnerid integer,
name varchar(32),
wduserid integer,
primary key(wcpartnerid)
) without oids;
And the three tables were created in the same session within about 1
minute of each other.
By way of comparison, the oids for the Slony slave (7.4.11) are
wcpartner 38220869
wccustomdata 38221080
wccustpartnerdata 38221139
This is a normal production database with slony replication 1.1.5 and is
mainly accessed from a web application using JDBC.
I don't use any temporary tables - so what can be using up all the OIDs
(especially between two successive create table statements)?
It looks like the db is using them at the rate of 1.5 million per day.
At what value will I hit a wraparound, and what options do I have to
identify/fix the (impending) problem.
Thanks.
John
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2006-06-11 17:42:55 | Disk corruption detection |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-06-11 17:20:17 | Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully |