| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
| Date: | 2006-06-05 14:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 44843CCA.1080306@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby wrote:
>
> What about my suggestion of runing CVS a second time if we get
> extraneous files the first go-round? I'm guessing there'd have to be a
> sleep in there as well...
The trouble with running "cvs update" a second time is that it will be
just as liable to fail as the first run. So I am following your
suggestion, but with this modification: after a sleep we will run "cvs
status" which will not have the same issues, because it doesn't create
or delete anything, and will show us any extraneous files/directories
that might be present.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-06-05 15:12:43 | Re: Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2 |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-06-05 13:29:56 | Re: More thoughts about planner's cost estimates |