From: | "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Date: | 2010-05-04 16:33:26 |
Message-ID: | 447e467376088e0e1cf10aee567dd541.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 4, 2010 18:19, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 18:10 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> It would be interesting if anyone repeated these simple tests and
>> produced evidence that these non-HS.
>>
>> (Unfortunately, I have at the moment not much time for more testing)
>
> Would you be able to make those systems available for further testing?
No. sorry.
> First, I'd perform the same test with the systems swapped, so we know
> more about the symmetry of the issue. After that, would like to look
> more into internals.
you mean "systems swapped", primary and standby? primary and standby were on the same machine in
these tests (even the same raid).
I can eventually move the standby (the 'slow' side, as it stands) to another, quite similar
machine. Not in the coming days though...
> Is it possible to setup SytemTap and dtrace on these systems?
I did install systemtap last week. dtrace is not installed (I think. I've never used either.)
Erik Rijkers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-04 17:00:17 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-04 16:19:47 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |