| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
| Date: | 2006-05-26 15:45:40 |
| Message-ID: | 447722A4.9000901@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Please read the developers FAQ:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html
For the most part, patches are probably best generated relative to the
root directory of your CVS checkout.
cheers
andrew
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> I have made the changes to implement this TODO item. I wish to
> know the standard procedure (command) to generate a patch; and from
> which level in the source directory should I execute it?
>
> On 5/18/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Added to TODO:
>>
>> * Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside a transcation
>> should abort
>> the transaction.
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2006-05-26 15:55:19 | Re: Inefficient bytea escaping? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-26 15:42:29 | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2006-05-26 16:00:22 | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-26 15:42:29 | Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |