| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
| Date: | 2006-05-23 07:23:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4472B889.5090308@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the hard part of this task is designing the API for access to
> the rowsets from triggers.
>
My preference would be something similar to two Portal instances (the NEW and OLD). I could
then map it in the same way that I map the result of a query. If the API actually used two
real Portal instances, the PL/Java implementation would take minutes.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2006-05-23 23:39:56 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL -- triggers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-22 23:47:46 | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD | 2006-05-23 07:49:16 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-05-23 07:03:36 | API changes in patch release |