| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New feature proposal |
| Date: | 2006-05-19 16:02:18 |
| Message-ID: | 446DEC0A.7090500@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc Munro wrote:
> Veil http://pgfoundry.org/projects/veil is currently not a very good
> Postgres citizen. It steals what little shared memory it needs from
> postgres' shared memory using ShmemAlloc().
>
> For Postgres 8.2 I would like Veil to be a better citizen and use only
> what shared memory has been reserved for postgres add-ins.
Why should this be individually restricted? AFAICS Veil's functionality
would be essential to access row level ACL controlled tables, so if it
fails for low mem conditions it's much like a backend failure.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-19 16:03:17 | Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-19 15:59:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. |