Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-19 15:11:42
Message-ID: 446DE02E.7030101@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

When MySQL is at that
> point, which database do you think executives will be choosing? The one
> with a very large userbase and lots of marketing and PR that they've
> heard plenty about,

All due respect, Jim -- but don't you work for a publicly traded
database company that happens to have its own version of PostgreSQL?

This is really a discussion for your marketing (and mine frankly) then
the PostgreSQL mailing lists :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-19 15:29:23 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-19 14:59:49 Re: [HACKERS] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Frost 2006-05-19 15:23:11 Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-19 14:59:49 Re: [HACKERS] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach.