Re: Compression and on-disk sorting

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
Date: 2006-05-16 00:42:53
Message-ID: 4469200D.7000104@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
>> I think the real reason Oracle and others practically re-wrote
>> their own VM-system and filesystems is that at the time it was
>> important for them to run under Windows98; where it was rather
>> easy to write better filesystems than your customer's OS was
>> bundled with.
>
> Windows98? No, those decisions predate any thought of running Oracle
> on Windows, probably by decades. But I think the thought process was
> about as above whenever they did make it; they were running on some
> pretty stupid OSes way back when.

Windows XP?

****runs****

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ipig 2006-05-16 02:17:09 Why use " != "
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-16 00:12:06 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting