From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
Date: | 2006-05-15 22:37:54 |
Message-ID: | 446902C2.9050707@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> There's an fadvise that tells the OS to compress the data if it actually
> makes it to disk?
Compressed-filesystem extension (like e2compr, and I think either
Fat or NTFS) can do that.
I think the reasons against adding this feature to postgresql are
largely the same as the reasons why compressed filesystems aren't
very popular.
Has anyone tried running postgresql on a compressing file-system?
I'd expect the penalties to outweigh the benefits (or they'd be
more common); but if it gives impressive results, it might add
weight to this feature idea.
Ron M
I think the real reason Oracle and others practically re-wrote
their own VM-system and filesystems is that at the time it was
important for them to run under Windows98; where it was rather
easy to write better filesystems than your customer's OS was
bundled with.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-15 22:46:32 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-05-15 22:12:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's |