From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table |
Date: | 2006-05-11 19:53:21 |
Message-ID: | 44639631.4090802@osdl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:55 -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think
>>> the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we
>>> might see for normal small xlog writes.
>>> I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks.
>> Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with
>> full_page_wirtes = off. The new data is at the bottom of the page:
>> http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html
>
> Mark,
>
> What do you think is causing the step changes at 30+ and 60+ minutes on
> these tests?
>
I'm at a loss to explain this myself. The increase in the i/o wait and
decrease in the response time charts looks backwards to me. And the
vmstat charts show that the i/o seems fairly consistent other than
spikes in i/o chart. It sort of looks like the operating system stopped
doing something but I'm not sure how to isolate that any further.
Anyone else have a theory?
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-11 19:57:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-11 19:51:46 | Re: Compiling on 8.1.3 on Openserver 5.05 |