Re: Search thoughts

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Search thoughts
Date: 2006-05-11 16:46:51
Message-ID: 44636A7B.20707@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Reposting because I realize that everyone was in bed or heading home
when this came through:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been doing some example searching with our search engine and was
> wondering if we can adjust the weights a little differently. For example:
>
> ALTER TABLE, first link is:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node203.html
>
> Which although accurate is way out dated. It seems we should weight a
> docs search higher with the current docs having the most weight?
>
> The same happens with many of the commands such as CREATE INDEX...
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-05-11 18:10:24 Re: Search thoughts
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-05-11 16:34:13 Re: Dumping the banner ads