From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Search thoughts |
Date: | 2006-05-11 16:46:51 |
Message-ID: | 44636A7B.20707@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Reposting because I realize that everyone was in bed or heading home
when this came through:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been doing some example searching with our search engine and was
> wondering if we can adjust the weights a little differently. For example:
>
> ALTER TABLE, first link is:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node203.html
>
> Which although accurate is way out dated. It seems we should weight a
> docs search higher with the current docs having the most weight?
>
> The same happens with many of the commands such as CREATE INDEX...
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-05-11 18:10:24 | Re: Search thoughts |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-05-11 16:34:13 | Re: Dumping the banner ads |