Re: in memory views

Scott Marlowe wrote:

>On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:54, Thomas Vatter wrote:
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Yes, the difference between psql command line and application is 6
>>seconds to 40 seconds. It is
>>exactly the step resultSet = excecuteQuery() that needs 40 seconds. I
>>use next() as a cursor
>>through the resultSet, but I fear this is not enough, do I have to use
>>createStatement(resultSetType,
>>resultSetConcurrency) respectively prepareStatement (resultSetType,
>>resultSetConcurrency) to
>>achieve the cursor behaviour?
>>
>>
>
>Not sure. I don't use a lot of prepared statements. I tend to build
>queries and throw the at the database. In that instance, it's done
>like:
>
>create cursor cursorname as select (rest of query here);
>fetch from cursorname;
>
>You can find more on cursors here:
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-declare.html
>
>Not sure if you can use them with prepared statements, or if prepared
>statements have their own kind of implementation.
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>
>

Yes, I have used embedded sql and create cursor, fetch before I started
with jdbc, seems that
I have to find out if new jdbc has a better way than simply resultSet =
statement.executeQuery().

regards
tom