| From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |
| Date: | 2006-05-02 21:49:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4457D3DD.4060307@nedscape.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Yeah, but the Oil for Food Program used Oracle ;-)
Joshua Kramer wrote:
>
> Oh, my.... I wonder how they came to these conclusions!
>
> http://linuxpr.com/releases/8687.html
>
> "With the release of MySQL 5.0 and its new features -- including stored
> procedures, triggers and views -- the reasons why we were looking at
> PostgreSQL no longer existed," continued Vertucci. "MySQL proved to be
> easier to set up, easier to manage and has become a widely-deployed
> standard in the developing countries, helping governments to achieve
> significant costs savings, without sacrificing database speed and power."
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-02 22:28:20 | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-05-02 21:10:52 | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |