From: | Eric Lam <elam(at)lisasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow restoration question |
Date: | 2006-04-30 23:37:25 |
Message-ID: | 44554A35.7060308@lisasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Eric Lam <elam(at)lisasoft(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>what is the quickest way of dumping a DB and restoring it? I have done a
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> "pg_dump -D database | split --line-bytes 1546m part"
>>
>>
>
>Don't use "-D" if you want fast restore ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
thanks, I read that from the doco, the reason why I am using the -D
option is because I was informed by previous people in the company that
they never got a 100% strike rate in database restoration without using
the -D or -d options. If I have enough space on the QA/staging machine
I'll give the no options dump restoration a try.
Anyone have any estimates the time differences between the -D, -d and
[using no option].
regards
Eric Lam
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Dutcher | 2006-05-01 00:36:11 | Re: query performance question |
Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2006-04-30 14:03:46 | Re: Why so slow? |