From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] Make relpathbackend return a statically result instead of palloc()'ing it |
Date: | 2013-01-08 23:23:30 |
Message-ID: | 4451.1357687410@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> And functions that return static buffers are evil incarnate. I've
> spent way too much of my life dealing with the supreme idiocy that is
> fmtId(). If someone ever finds a way to make that go away, I will buy
> them a beverage of their choice at the next conference we're both at.
Yeah, that was exactly the case that was top-of-mind when I was
complaining about static return buffers upthread.
It's not hard to make the ugliness go away: just let it strdup its
return value. The problem is that in the vast majority of usages it
wouldn't be convenient to free the result, so we'd have a good deal
of memory leakage. What might be interesting is to instrument it to
see how much (adding a counter to the function ought to be easy enough)
and then find out whether it's an amount we still care about in 2013.
Frankly, pg_dump is a memory hog already - a few more identifier-sized
strings laying about might not matter anymore.
(Wanders away wondering how many relpathbackend callers bother to free
its result, and whether that matters either ...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-09 00:04:32 | Re: Index build temp files |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-01-08 22:48:55 | Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers |